mandylevenberg

Archive for March, 2009|Monthly archive page

Cause Consumers in a down economy…

In Uncategorized on March 30, 2009 at 9:20 pm

I get asked about this a lot with clients… now that the economy has tanked, will cause consumption take a dive as well?

Here is what I tell them…

-Cause consumption remains on the rise

-Cause is a competitive advantage

-Cause is expected by consumers, employees, investors.

-Cause affiliation leads to high brand recall

-Cause affiliation can  lead to sales increase/increase in actual purchase

-Cause helps break through the marketing clutter

-Cause is personal and consumers still want to have a say in what cause their money goes to and how it is being used.

-Cause calculation= emotional satisfaction

-Consumers are likely to give differently- using different vehicles for giving in the recession (volunteering vs. donating)

-Local organizations (food banks, shelters) are top of mind for consumers who want to make sure they can sense their impact when they donate money or time. (last year Africa, this year your local foodbank)

And for some numbers to back it all up:

-The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University says that historically, charitable giving has been recession-proof.Contributions to American charities have increased during 39 of the past 40 years in today’s dollars, and a change in the tax laws (not the stock market crash) can be blamed for the drop in 1987.  Between 69 and 72 percent of people give routinely.

-2008 Cone/Duke University Behavioral Cause Study and the 2008 Cone Cause Evolution Study:View Post

  • Exponential sales increases (74% and 28%) in two cause-related product categories
  • Participants spent nearly twice as long reviewing cause-related ads as general corporate advertisements
  • 78% of Americans feel companies should maintain their philanthropic giving or even give more during tough economic times
  • 79% of Americans would be likely to switch brands to one associated with a good cause (compared to 66% in 1993)
  • Education, economic development and health and disease topped the list of priority issues for companies to address
  • 85% of Americans say they have a more positive image of a product or company when it supports a cause they care about (remains unchanged from 1993)
  • 85% feel it is acceptable for companies to involve a cause in their marketing (compared to 66% in 1993)
  • 79% say they would be likely to switch from one brand to another, when price and quality are about equal, if the other brand is associated with a good cause (compared to 66% in 1993)
  • 38% percent have bought a product associated with a cause in the last 12 months (compared to 20% in 1993)

I knew I loved my Subaru for a reason!

In Uncategorized on March 23, 2009 at 11:25 am

08my_outbk_25i1Even if they didn’t make the cup holder big enough to fit my Nalgene, I have loved our outback through and through…

Check out this killer case study by the WSJ- Greener & Cheaper…


Since 2000, the company says, it has reduced the amount of waste it generates per vehicle by about 47%. Of the solid waste that the factory still generates, 99.9% is recycled or used by other companies as manufacturing inputs or as raw materials that they process to resell. The remaining 0.1% is hazardous waste that must by law be incinerated by a licensed facility.


LEVEL 1: Compliance
Management’s focus is on compliance with environmental rules and regulations. Green is considered a cost.

LEVEL 2: Opportunistic and Ad Hoc
Some environmental awareness. Management opportunistically takes advantage of low-cost, money-saving green projects.

LEVEL 3: Analytical and Systematic
Environmental impact is systematically measured, and the information used by management to select improvement projects. The company is building its understanding of the relationships between environmental impact, cost and risk in its business.

LEVEL 4: Integrated Into Daily Operations
Everyone in the company is expected to be involved in improving the company’s green performance, and most ideas come from the bottom up. Green becomes an integral part of what makes the company profitable.

LEVEL 5: Pioneering
The organization is developing approaches on the leading edge of current environmental practice and thinking.

Carbon Footprint/Caloric intake—it all matters

In Uncategorized on March 22, 2009 at 10:32 pm

img_bookcover1

My dear friend, Kate Geagan, from college is smart as hell…and she just published a book that nails the current consumer desire- to overlap their planetary and personal health in a calculable fashion.

Check this book out-Kate writes well and offers a bunch of great information and tips.

And see Bittmans’s piece in today’s NYTIMES – a Michael Pollen-esque declaration about organics and other considerations beyond that USOrganic label.

Lastly- WOO HOO, Obama’s continue to give me reasons to love them. A garden in their backyard- way to set an example for millions to follow.

Low Impact Living- a great landing

In Uncategorized on March 5, 2009 at 12:15 pm

logo1

Check this new site out: Low Impact Living— Whether you are looking to save green by going green OR approaching that personal/planetary health intersection and wonder what to do… this site has a lot to offer and its got a great user interface.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.